[Newtalk新聞]
After the 403 earthquake in Taiwan, the outside world paid attention to the problem of residential structures. Taipei Mayor Chiang Wanan also announced that he has entered the “urban renewal era”, hoping to speed up the renewal of old buildings in Taipei City. However, DPP city councilor Xu Shuhua believes that many area bonuses end up back in the hands of builders and not necessarily in the hands of citizens. How can we return the area to citizens and truly realize “one square meter for one square meter”? But Li Sichuan, deputy mayor of Peking City, said, don’t put the “one ping for one ping” curse there. It cannot be done everywhere in Taipei City. It may be possible on Ren’ai Road, but can it also be done in Beitou’s houses? ?
Jiang Wanan today led a team to the Democratic Progressive Party Group of the North City Council to report on major bills. Xu Shuhua pointed out that the city has launched a metropolitan renewal plan, but it has not said whether the area bonus can be increased. However, Jinghua City has been able to receive the highest area bonus in history. It has been issued before. The bureau told her that “capacity is public property.” But public property can be given to Jinghua City, but not to the citizens of Taipei? She didn’t even mention the report submitted by the North City Government today, which is really disappointing.
Li Sichuan responded that in addition to the disaster prevention type, this volume bonus also exceeded the ceiling. 30% for sea sand houses. If the house was built before 1974, 30% does not need to be appraised. In addition to the volume By transferring it, you can get twice the volume bonus that exceeds the land use zoning control rules.
However, Xu Shuhua believes that many area bonuses end up back in the hands of builders and may not necessarily be in the hands of citizens. How can we improve and return the area to citizens to achieve “one square meter for one square meter”?
Li Sichuan said bluntly that he had always believed that the curse of “one ping for one ping” should not be put there because it depends on the location. Xu Shuhua said, if people’s houses were originally 20 square meters or 30 square meters, but were later changed to only live in 15 or 16 square meters, is there any way to deal with it? And these are ordinary ordinary people in the city. The rich ones have left long ago, and too many of them are people who stay in her old houses in Xinyi District. Not to mention that one square meter for one square meter is a curse, it is the expectation of the people.
Li Sichuan said, “I don’t think Taipei City can do it.” He wanted to say with certainty that it is impossible to “change one square meter for one square meter” in every place in Taipei City. For example, the whole house will not only give volume bonuses, but also To provide interest subsidies, if the land is on Renai Road, “I dare you to say that I can exchange one ping for one ping”, but if it is in Beitou, do you also ask for “one ping for one ping”? Even with current prices, he finds it very difficult.
Hsu Shu-hua denounced, then please ask Jiang Wanan to officially declare that it is impossible to replace one ping for one ping in Taipei City, and ask all Taipei citizens to give up. Jiang Wanan emphasized that not every place can meet such standards. He fully understands people’s expectations and needs and will meet people’s needs through many supporting measures and programs, but the reality must also be considered.
View original text
More Newtalk news reports
It is rumored that before the term of office expired, Mayor Nan sent someone to represent Lai Qingde to confirm to Concubine Chen Ting that there was no such thing.
The Beijing Municipal Youth Bureau was officially established on June 1, and important policies were not included in the report.
