Behind the Scenes/After Ma Ying-jeou met Xi Jinping, he proposed anti-infiltration law amendment officials revealed the culprits of the 1992 Consensus and the anti-Taiwan independence alliance | Politics | Sanli News Network SETN.COM

Reporter Li Guanzhi/Reporting from Taipei

▲Chinese President Xi Jinping and former President Ma Ying-jeou (combination picture)

Just after former President Ma Ying-jeou met with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the Kuomintang will lead a delegation to visit China again. It is reported that Fu Kunqi, the convener of the Kuomintang Legislative Yuan caucus, will lead the legislators on this trip. During the meeting between Ma and Xi, Xi Jinping praised Ma Ying-jeou in person, saying that he adhered to the 1992 Consensus and opposed Taiwan independence. But when did the 1992 Consensus involve opposing Taiwan independence? A person who participated in the cross-strait talks in 1992 revealed the historical truth to Sanli News Network. He pointed out that it was the Chinese Communist Party that changed the definition of the 1992 Consensus, and it was Lien Chan who linked the 1992 Consensus to anti-Taiwan independence in 2005!

People who participated in the 1992 cross-strait talks pointed out why the CCP frequently manipulates the 1992 Consensus? Their “staged goals use this as a packaged bait to trap us, and then force us step by step to recognize the one-China principle.” This is also the essence of Xi Jinping’s discussion at the second meeting between Ma and Xi! Looking back on the history of that year, he said, “Nowadays, many politicians and people with specific stances say that we made mistakes when they meet the CCP.” This person pointed out that when the late former President Lee Teng-hui visited the United States in 1995, the CCP made a big statement that Taiwan violated the 1992 Consensus. , unilaterally cutting off the institutionalized consultations between the SEF and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits. “This is the first time that he has changed their narrative, but what does the visit to Cornell University have to do with the SEF and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits? This is entirely the CCP’s own fault. Definition.

The source emphasized, “It was the Chinese Communist Party that first changed the one-sided definition of the ‘1992 Consensus,’ not us.” After 1996, due to the missile crisis, the two sides almost turned against each other. The Taiwan government has always emphasized that Lee Teng-hui’s visit to Cornell’s alma mater did not violate On the issue of the 1992 consensus, the CCP turned its back and believed that there should be no room for each to express its opinions. “We talked about it in 1996, but today some people still say that one China can have separate expressions.” In 2005, after Lien Chan, then chairman of the Kuomintang (ruling party), visited China to meet Hu Jintao, he said that there was a “Lian-Hu Consensus” and linked the 1992 Consensus with opposition to Taiwan independence.

The person emphasized that after Lien Chan returned to Taiwan that year, he forced Ma Ying-jeou to include the 1992 Consensus and anti-Taiwan independence in the KMT’s policy platform. “The CCP is good at using people close to him” to manipulate the political goals they want to achieve. This example is very Many people in Taiwan are willing to be such people! The 1992 Consensus and Anti-Taiwan Independence In 2009, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi began to spread this discussion internationally. Therefore, today, on many occasions, the CCP is required to say that it opposes and does not support Taiwan independence. Even the United States is forced to say so. This word, but the emergence of “Taiwan independence” has nothing to do with 1992, and has nothing to do with the establishment of an institutionalized communication and consultation mechanism between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. “Today, unfortunately, they are linked together.”

On April 10 this year, former President Ma Ying-jeou met with Chinese President Xi Jinping and once again reiterated the distorted “1992 Consensus.” This person emphasized, “What Ma Ying-jeou said in front of Xi Jinping is not our version of Taiwan!” As for the other side of the Taiwan Strait, Using the deformed 1992 Consensus, the Kuomintang frequently pointed out that their so-called “One China” is the “One China” under the Constitution. This person pointed out, “What I say at home and what I say in cross-strait negotiations are completely different things!” Ma Ying-jeou also said before going out that he would defend The Republic of China claims that current President Tsai Ing-wen should land on Taiping Island to defend the sovereignty of the Republic of China, but after arriving in China, the “Republic of China” disappears.

This person emphasized that if it is to be a principle and standard that both sides of the Taiwan Strait should abide by, both sides of the Taiwan Strait should accept such terms, or accept the interpretation of the meaning of the terms. To be honest, “Looking at the document dated August 1, 1992, The meaning of “One China” is more advanced and detailed than the First Central Committee of the Constitution.” It is important for the other party to accept it. “You hide yourself at home and hide under the quilt and talk about the Republic of China… It has no impact on cross-Strait relations. “Yes.” He asked, “When Lian Shengwen and Xia Liyan arrive in China, can they accept the Constitution? If so, I will clap my hands and at least speak out.” The person reiterated, you can. It is unhelpful to put forward a proposition, but this proposition does not create opposition between different positions within Taiwan.