CNEWS Convergence News Network reporter Zhang Xiaoyi/Reporting from Taipei
The Tainan District Prosecutor’s Office was investigating a case of suspected misappropriation by a lessee of state-owned non-public land for leasing and setting up solar photovoltaic power generation equipment for use. It was discovered that Liyang Group was engaged in land consolidation in the Qigu District of Tainan City and was suspected of illegality. President of Liyang Technology, Gu Shenghui Lin Wenxin, leader of the Solar Photovoltaic Group of the Energy Administration of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, and Chen Kailing, the former economic development director of the Tainan City Government, solved the application for land use for non-urban land with an area of less than 2 hectares, commonly known as Xiaoerjia, and the profit reached 9.12 billion yuan. Today ( The investigation was concluded on 26), and 15 people, including Lin Wenxin, Chen Kailing, and Gu Shenghui, were prosecuted, and 12 of them were recommended to be given harsher sentences. .
Prosecutors stated that during the past 111 years, during the investigation of a case of suspected embezzlement by a lessee of state-owned non-public land for renting out and setting up solar photovoltaic power generation equipment for use, it was discovered that the Liyang Group was engaged in land consolidation in the Qigu District area of Tainan City and was suspected of being illegal. After pre-inspection Chang Ye Shuwen directed the division of the case, and the prosecutor of the Black Money Prosecution Team directed the Tainan City Investigation Division of the Investigation Bureau and prosecutorial affairs officers to form a special team to investigate.
After careful evidence collection and investigation, the project staff launched 6 searches in succession, searching a total of 68 locations, and seized 267 application plans, 550 notarized contracts, 10 mobile phones, cloud hard drive information, computers, pen drives, laptops, cash and other items worth 37.8 million yuan. In addition, prosecutors interrogated defendants and witnesses a total of 246 times. After interrogating defendant Xu Shuoting in October 2012, they found that his criminal suspicion was serious and that there was a risk of colluding with accomplices or witnesses, etc., so he applied to the court for permission to prohibit detention.
The prosecutor pointed out that in recent years, there has been a large increase in development cases involving the conversion of Xiaoerjia Optoelectronics to photovoltaic use, resulting in fragmentation of agricultural land and related use disputes, seriously affecting the integrity of the agricultural production environment. The Ministry of Agriculture announced on July 28, 2019 and in August of the same year The “Agricultural Competent Authority’s approval of the key points for review of changes in the use of agricultural land” has been updated effective on January 1. Except for the exceptions that meet the key points, Xiaoerjia’s application to change the land use category for solar photovoltaic facilities is no longer approved, which is also commonly known as The Xiao Erjia ban.
Gu Shenghui of Liyang Group and others knew that after August 1, 2020, the small and medium-sized second-class cases applied for in the name of Wutian Company did not comply with the exceptions to the key points of the review operation. In order to obtain approval for the review of small and medium-sized second-class cases, I was not affected by the ban on Xiao Erjia and could continue to submit applications. In September 2010, I contacted the Energy Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Tainan City Economic Development Bureau and asked if I could issue a document signed with the landowner before July 31, 2019. Land ownership consent documents and other supporting documents can be included in the scope of the “109 Solar Photovoltaic 6.5GW Standard Compliance Plan” and are not affected by the Xiaoerjia ban.
Lin Wenxin, then leader of the Solar Photovoltaic Group of the Energy Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Chen Kailing, former director of the Tainan City Economic Development Bureau, and others all knew that the Liyang Group was not affected by the Xiao Erjia ban as the site for filing the case, and would use the land use consent form with false dates. The application, and it was already in 2010, also does not comply with the later paragraph of the proviso on the key points of the review operation, which states that “the executive Yuan approved the 109 solar photovoltaic 6.5GW compliance plan to be listed and managed before July 31, 2019.” According to the requirements, due to Gu Shenghui’s constant request and pressure, he actually agreed to the proposal and convened a photovoltaic promotion discussion meeting to gradually incorporate the Liyang Group’s demands into the 109-year solar photovoltaic 6.5GW compliance plan. The identification status allows Liyang Group’s application to avoid the more complicated review procedures.
Gu Shenghui, Lin Wenxin, Chen Kailing and others conspired to exchange the original application documents with the Tainan City Economic and Development Bureau and other minor second-class bans with a land use consent letter with an incorrect date. The Tainan City Economic and Development Bureau informed that it has received information on the supplementary land use consent document before July 31, 2020, and will immediately plan the implementation plan for backfilling and backfilling the land use consent document date.
Afterwards, the Energy Bureau held a terrestrial photovoltaic promotion meeting in September and October 2019, led by defendants Lin Wenxin and Chen Kailing, and strongly included Liyang Group’s demands into the review scope of the 6.5GW solar photovoltaic compliance plan in 2019. Within the period, the Liyang Group prepared a “Solar Photovoltaic Facilities Construction Business Plan and Agricultural Land Change Instructions” with a land use consent document with an incorrect date, and submitted the original business plan and agricultural land change instructions to the Tainan City Economic and Development Bureau or another one. Apply and exercise it.
Chen Kailing instructs the Tainan City Economic Development Bureau to undertake the civil service to identify Liyang Group’s supplementary information and the business and agricultural reform instructions that have been applied for, all of which are in line with the review status of the 109-year solar photovoltaic 6.5GW compliance plan, and are not subject to small The impact of the 2A ban.
The Energy Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and other units will then proceed with the follow-up review work accordingly, and approve the consent letter for the establishment of a power generation industry and the consent letter for the change of agricultural land use. The Tainan City Economic Development Bureau will issue a consent letter for Wutian Company’s business plan. As a result, Wutian Company can save a total of approximately 8.3 million yuan in technician visa fees, development impact fees, outflow control plans and proposals required to apply for development projects, and can continue to use the leased land facilities. The illegal profits from solar photovoltaic utilization are estimated to be NT$9.126018763.
Photo source: CNEWS Convergence News Network file photo
“More CNEWS Convergence News Network Reports”:
Ace Exchange’s virtual currency fraud case prosecuted Lin Genghong and Pan Yizhang and sentenced to more than 20 years in prison
The former director of the Legislator’s Office sexually assaulted a female reporter and the second trial reduced the sentence for settlement and compensation.
[Please indicate the source when reprinting the article]
Tags: ban small businesses lifted Tainan Economic Development Director Chen Kailing sued
-
