In the Tainan Optoelectronics scandal, the Energy Department said that the review principle of “one-size-fits-all application” is absolutely unprofitable.

The Tainan District Prosecutor’s Office sued the leader of the Energy Administration. The Energy Administration of the Ministry of Economic Affairs stated today (26th) that the origin of this case was that the Committee of Agriculture (the predecessor of the Ministry of Agriculture) updated the key points of agricultural reform on July 28, 2020, and on July 31 of the same year Effective immediately.After discussions between the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Ministry of Agriculture, and various county and city governments, the review principle of “one-size-fits-all” application for all counties and cities across the country was established, and applications from all optoelectronic manufacturers were reviewed on a “universal” basis. The policy does not favor specific counties or cities. , specific industry.

On July 28, 2020, the key points of the agricultural reform were added, stipulating that agricultural land less than 2 hectares cannot be installed with solar photovoltaics through land use change, and it will take effect three days later. The policy surprise was called the “Optoelectronic July 7th Incident” by the industry.

The Ministry of Economic Affairs stated thatWhat was established after deliberation was the “general regulations”.The policy does not favor specific counties, cities or specific industries.

The Ministry of Economic Affairs stated thatIf an operator is suspected of forging documents, he should be held legally responsible for his actions. It is inappropriate to regard a general policy that applies nationwide as a profit-seeking act. The Ministry of Economic Affairs will cooperate with the subsequent court proceedings, but also calls for the principle of not being in vain and not being indulged in order to avoid damaging the morale of civil servants.

The Energy Administration of the Ministry of Economic Affairs pointed out that among the following three review styles proposed after inter-ministerial, central and local discussions, operators need to have a clear scope of land.

1. To obtain an opinion letter from the land administration agency, a letter must be sent to the land administration agency before July 31, 2020, and a clear land inventory must be attached;

2. The impact scope of the system of adopting Taipower must be accepted and reviewed by Taipower before July 31, 2020, and the scope of the agricultural land change must be clear;

3. To collect direct or indirect supporting evidence for land consolidation, it is also necessary to obtain documents such as the landowner’s intention to use the land before July 31, 2020, the lease certificate, and the court notarized certification documents.

According to the Energy Administration of the Ministry of Economic Affairs,The review materials originally requested by the Ministry of Agriculture were difficult to implement during the practical review.For example, Taipower Corporation’s transmission grade parallel review opinion does not require operators to submit land inventories, and the 6.5GW standard compliance project is also a top-level promotion policy. There is also “no” related corresponding case inventory, so the Energy Administration of the Ministry of Economic Affairs only After discussing with the Ministry of Agriculture and various county and municipal governments, we established general case review principles to assist local governments in continuing the review in compliance with the aforementioned regulations.

More Taibao reports
Optoelectronics fraud is expected to profit 9.1 billion!Chen Kailing colluded with the “model civil servant” of the Executive Yuan to commit the crime. Prosecutors prosecuted and exposed the outrageous crime.
Optoelectronic manufacturers “changed the rules” after visiting Tainan City Government. Huang Weizhe escaped as a “witness” and Guo Zaiqin investigated in another case.
News/Former Nan City Economic Development Director Chen Kailing was prosecuted in the optoelectronics fraud case and it is recommended that he be given a harsher sentence

See more related news
Model civil servants actually teach businesses to exploit loopholes to make huge profits. Tainan Optoelectronics fraud case indicts 15 officials and businessmen
Liyang Optoelectronics was prosecuted in the case and suffered a lot of injustice: the private land was fragmented and narrow, and could only target minors
Tainan Liyang Optoelectronics was sued in the fraud case! Xie Longjie: Is there anyone else who is “assigned by superiors” to Chen Kailing?
Energy Bureau official involved in photovoltaic fraud case Zeng Wensheng: Administrative investigation launched
In the Tainan Optoelectronics scandal, the Energy Department said that the review principle of “one-size-fits-all application” is absolutely unprofitable.