The Tainan District Prosecutor’s Office has investigated and prosecuted Liyang Energy’s case of collusion between government and businessmen to resolve the ban on minor second-class workers. On the 26th, Liyang Energy not only expressed deep regret for the content of the prosecution’s prosecution, but also called on all walks of life to implement the case before the case is decided. The principle of “presumption of innocence” is to protect the rights and interests of relevant parties and protect due judicial procedures, avoid judgment without trial, and look forward to judicial restoration of the truth.
Li Yang Energy stated in a statement that the review of the Tainan Five Days case was for electric fields that had obtained the parallel review opinion for renewable energy power generation equipment from the Taiwan Electric Power Company before July 31, 2020. The review was completed in accordance with the law and the parallel review opinion was obtained. Later, the company went through the process of delivering the documents, but it was subject to restrictions that were not included in the regulations on the increase in civil servants. When the company made representations to the central and local governments in accordance with the law, it was misunderstood as a joint act of corruption and profit-making. This not only caused the company and employees to bear the pressure of negative public opinion, but also caused the government to The good intentions of promoting renewable energy policies have been distorted and discredited. The company will explain to the judge in court to clarify.
In addition, during the photovoltaic case site review process, the Tainan City Government handled non-urban land change applications to change the use of solar photovoltaic power generation facilities in a fair, just and open manner. At the same time, a joint review mechanism project was established to ensure a friendly environment. In addition to retaining the original Substantial review power. The members of the review committee also include experts from energy and electricity, electronics and motors, regional planning, geotechnical engineering, environmental conservation and other related professional knowledge and experience, and provide review consultation and opinions in an open and transparent manner.
Li Yang emphasized that he deeply regretted the content of the prosecution, but the company has always adhered to the spirit of legal operation and co-prosperity with the local area. Every piece of land acquired was obtained after reaching a consensus with the landlord or state-owned land lessee. For legal leasing, there is absolutely no local government escort or expediency that harms the rights and interests of residents.
Since a formal indictment has not yet been received, we do not know the content of the Tainan District Prosecutor’s Office’s prosecution. We will discuss the subsequent legal actions with lawyers after receiving the indictment before explaining to the public.
See more related news
Optoelectronic fraud case sued 15 government and business profiteers for 9.1 billion yuan, Huang Weizhe escaped unscathed
Xie Longjie questioned the Tainan Optoelectronics fraud case: Chen Kailing said it was “assigned by superiors”. Is there anyone else?
Gu Shenghui met with city officials through Guo Zaiqin
Li Yang cries out for injustice and urges people not to be sentenced without trial.
Lin Wenxin was awarded the Model Civil Servant for promoting the development of optoelectronics
