Xu Qiaoxin’s mother-in-law took out a 14.5 million yuan mortgage?Beifuyin responded

Kuomintang Legislator Xu Qiaoxin’s mother-in-law was questioned about taking out three mortgages on a house worth tens of millions. She took out a loan of 14.5 million yuan and over-loaned more than 4 million yuan. Taipei Fubon Bank, which handled the loan, officially issued a statement this afternoon (26th) in response to “all mortgages” It is handled according to the regulations, and there are no over-loans, restrictions or exceptions.”

Extended reading: Fubon Gold dividend is released!Cash dividend of 2.5 yuan and stock dividend of 0.5 yuan

Xu Qiaoxin was involved in the in-law dispute again. Her mother-in-law was questioned about the fact that she took out three mortgages on a house worth tens of millions. She took out a loan of 14.5 million yuan and over-loaned more than 4 million yuan. Therefore, Xu Qiaoxin was accused of helping Qiao with the loan.

Legislator Lin Chuyin also posted on Facebook that current information shows that Granny Xin’s house is set to be worth 14.5 million yuan to Bei Fuyin, and a reasonable estimate of the loan amount is 12 million yuan. However, the market price around the house does not exceed 10 million, and a normal loan can only get 8 million. The difference between the loan amount and the loan amount is as high as 4 million!

Lin Chuyin questioned that most people who work hard to buy a home can only borrow 80% of the loan. Why can Granny Xin extend the loan to a house with a market value of 10 million to 12 million? Chu Yin wants to ask if there is any problem with the bank’s appraisal?

Beifuyin’s statement is as follows:

The banking industry is highly supervised by financial regulatory authorities. The Bank has always complied with laws and regulations and relevant regulations when performing its business. While improving business management, it must also fully respect and protect the privacy rights of its customers.

Regarding the reported public loan cases, it was found that the relevant internal operations were handled in accordance with the bank’s regulations, and there were no irregularities, and there were no over-loans, complaints or exceptions.